Pages

Monday, April 16, 2012

Eritrea-Ethiopia: Algiers Agreement 10 years later!

The following video is from 2007 -- 5 years after the Algeries Agreement.  It is astounding that nothing has changed 5 years later (10 years after the agreement was signed).


 --- Youtube description of video follows -- 
The Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi & TPLF refuses to accept the UN sponsored Hague verdict - the FINAL and BINDING Algiers agreement between Eritrea and Ethiopia. And now are in the process to invade Eritrea under a false pretext.


In this video clip: After having announced full acceptance of the verdict, and for a little while danced with joy in the streets of Addis, with their Foreign Minister Seyoum Mesfin holding a press conference to tell the world that "the decision was fair and legal -- that sanity had won over insanity, and that the rule of law had prevailed over the rule of the jungle" they called upon the international community to obligate Eritrea to accept the decision as final and binding and further called upon the commission for a demarcation process to take place on the ground without further delay.



Well, I guess it had sounded too good to be true in the first place. Because, about sixteen months later, perhaps after having taken the time to confer with their American allies on the subject of face saving devices, on September of 2003, the TPLF made a turn about, and the world was startlingly awoken with their rampageous rejection and change of heart over the commission's findings and final verdict, calling it illegal, unjust and irresponsible, to which insolence and disrespect, of course, a red flag was never raised neither by the Americans nor by the security counsel of the United Nations. Nor was there a peep heard from the guarantors and witnesses of the agreement (UN, EU, USA, African Union).



PART I:


PART II:


Friday, April 13, 2012

Eritrea: Demarcation delayed is Justice Denied

In May 1998, Ethiopian troops fired and shot on an Eritrean platoon  on routine duty along the border town of Badme killing several of its members. The Eritrean government's response was one of patience and a resolute determination to resolve the matter peacefully. However, the minority led Ethiopian government's response was a declaration of an all out war on Eritrea under the pretext that Eritrea had invaded undefined Ethiopian territory that later was concocted as "Badme and its environs". The minority led Ethiopian government had hoped a war with Eritrea would give it the legitimacy it had failed to achieve domestically through its divisive and ethnocentric governance. 

After a catastrophic bloodshed, the case went for arbitration to the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague, the highest court of arbitration in the world. The independent boundary commission that was setup with the consent of the Ethiopian government rendered its unanimous, final and binding decision on April 13, 2002. The ruling of the commission has shown, without a doubt, that the town of Badme was a sovereign Eritrean territory. According to that decision, the government of Ethiopia was in fact found to be the aggressor that was illegally occupying Eritrean territory. 

Today is April 13, 2012 and it has been 10 years since the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague passed its final and binding decision. The ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration is not only final and binding as agreed upon by both parties, but it is also guaranteed by the United Nations, United States, the African Union and the European Union. No other agreement had such a backing and support of the world community. Yet, the United Nations and its powerful security council member, the United States, have not only allowed Ethiopia to renege on the agreement it signed but to remain in occupation of sovereign Eritrean territories for the last ten years. 

To add insult to injury, the United Nations also passed two resolutions, resolution 1907 and resolution 2023 that: 

  1. Limit Eritrean ability for self defense, especially as Ethiopia continues to occupy its sovereign territories and threatens its existence as a sovereign country. 
  2. Limiting the government of Eritrea's ability to improve the standard of living of its people by restricting international investments in the booming mining sector and the restriction of remittance of its citizens abroad. 

If the people of Eritrea have felt wronged by the world body and especially the United States when the United Nations federated Eritrea with Ethiopia in 1950, setting off the 30 years of independence war, it has not fared any better today. No lessons have been learned by US leaders or the international community. 

Today, thousands of Eritreans have been displaced by the continued occupation of Eritrean territories by Ethiopia. Ethiopia continues to threaten Eritrea's existence by provoking the nation through cross border raids, killing innocent civilians and open support of known terrorist groups. The world body continues to remain silent to the continued injustice against Eritrea today as it has in the past. 

If the United States wants to be taken seriously as a broker of peace in the world, then it must enforce agreements it guarantees and force its ally Ethiopia to allow the physical demarcation of the border to proceed in accordance with the delimitation and demarcation decisions it witnessed and guaranteed. Justice demands that agreements signed in good faith be respected.