Skip to main content

Ethiopia has the largest Muslim Population in the Horn of Africa


Successive of its leaders have sold Ethiopia as “a Christian nation in the strategically important Red Sea region dominated by nations that are hostile to the interests of Israel and the United States.”  As such, Ethiopia has received enormous financial and military support from the United States. The current minority government in Ethiopia has gone even further by painting  the horn of Africa region as a hot bed of extremists and it has labeled itself as the front to the war on terror. This cannot be any further from the truth. 

The fact is that Ethiopia's population of 80 million is evenly split between followers of Islam and Orthodox  Christianity.  That puts the Muslim population in Ethiopia around 40 million.  That is larger than the Muslim population of Eritrea (2.5 Million), Djibouti (880,000), Somalia (10 Million), Kenya (4.5 Million) and Uganda (4 Million).  The Muslim population of Ethiopia is even larger than of Sudan estimated at 30 million. 

However, the Muslims in the horn of Africa region practice a moderate form of Islam and are by and large law abiding citizens. The Christian and Islamic communities in the horn of Africa have a long tradition of religious tolerance.  Christian and Muslim communities are intermingled and have a harmonious co-existence.  Most attend the same schools and attend each others social events. This is not to say extremists do not exist in the region. The U.S. embassy bombings in the capitals of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania and Nairobi, Kenya in 1998 are a stark reminders that extremists do exist in the region and that the United States must stay vigilant. However, the United States war on terror in the Horn of Africa lacks an honest partner when it comes to Ethiopia. 

The Ethiopian government has exploited its support for the war on terrorism on many fronts, including but not limited to silencing critics within the United States government of its gross repression of democratic forces in Ethiopia. Ethiopia has gotten United States support in the Security Council to sanction Eritrea as a supporter of extremists in Somalia when the fact is Eritrea has a stellar record of fighting extremists since its independence in 1991. On the other hand Ethiopia continues to invade Somalia under the false pretense of fighting terrorists when in fact it has done more to create them and has no interest in getting rid of them. If Somalia becomes stable, the government of Ethiopia knows full well it will loose the blank check it has been getting from the United States. It is time for the United States to re-evaluates its relationship with Ethiopia and its goals and objectives in the horn of Africa.

Yemane Abselom

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A response to Professor Joel Brinkley: Eritrea has a remarkable story to tell

Professor Joel Brinkley wrote an article on the San Francisco Chronicle under the title "Eritrea, the most repressive nation on Earth", on April 29, 2012.  When Joel Brinkley, a professor of journalism at Stanford University and a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, writes on Eritrea, one hopes it would be an original piece that explores the complex issues in depth.  However, the contents of his column were nothing but a copy and paste of several reports that have misleading information on Eritrea and a complete avoidance of current and recent events that lead us to where we are today.  Professor Brinkley has chosen to ignore the elephant in the room and he expects us to do the same. It is true Eritrea won its independence in 1991, after waging a 30 years long and bitter struggle for independence.  Between 1991 and 1998, before the war with Ethiopia broke out, Eritrea under the current leadership had won many accolades, including the New York Times, ...

A Response to Former Ethiopian President Mulatu Teshome Wirtu's article on Al Jazeera

A Response to "To Avoid Another Conflict in the Horn of Africa, Now is the Time to Act" by Former Ethiopian President Mulatu Teshome Wirtu on Al Jazeera By: Yemane Abselom (wedi abselom) February 18, 2025 For decades, global news reporting has been dominated by Western media outlets such as the BBC (British), VOA (American), and DW (German). While these outlets claim to uphold principles of free and independent journalism, their coverage often aligns with Western political and economic agendas. When Al Jazeera emerged, there was hope that it would provide an alternative voice—one that would prioritize the interests of the Middle East and the Global South. Its early reporting on Iraq and Afghanistan, which exposed Western propaganda and war crimes, won it widespread respect. However, telling the truth comes at a cost, and it appears that those financing Al Jazeera were unwilling to continue paying that price. Over time, its editorial stance has drifted closer to that of Wester...

Eritrea: Demarcation delayed is Justice Denied

In May 1998, Ethiopian troops fired and shot on an Eritrean platoon   on routine duty along the border town of Badme killing several of its  members. The Eritrean government's response was one of patience and a  resolute determination to resolve the matter peacefully. However, the  minority led Ethiopian government's response was a declaration of an  all out war on Eritrea under the pretext that Eritrea had invaded  undefined Ethiopian territory that later was concocted as "Badme and  its environs". The minority led Ethiopian government had hoped a war  with Eritrea would give it the legitimacy it had failed to achieve  domestically through its divisive and ethnocentric governance.  After a catastrophic bloodshed, the case went for arbitration to the  Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague, the highest court of  arbitration in the world. The independent boundary commission that  was setup with the consent of the ...