Skip to main content

Eritrea: Demarcation delayed is Justice Denied

In May 1998, Ethiopian troops fired and shot on an Eritrean platoon  on routine duty along the border town of Badme killing several of its members. The Eritrean government's response was one of patience and a resolute determination to resolve the matter peacefully. However, the minority led Ethiopian government's response was a declaration of an all out war on Eritrea under the pretext that Eritrea had invaded undefined Ethiopian territory that later was concocted as "Badme and its environs". The minority led Ethiopian government had hoped a war with Eritrea would give it the legitimacy it had failed to achieve domestically through its divisive and ethnocentric governance. 

After a catastrophic bloodshed, the case went for arbitration to the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague, the highest court of arbitration in the world. The independent boundary commission that was setup with the consent of the Ethiopian government rendered its unanimous, final and binding decision on April 13, 2002. The ruling of the commission has shown, without a doubt, that the town of Badme was a sovereign Eritrean territory. According to that decision, the government of Ethiopia was in fact found to be the aggressor that was illegally occupying Eritrean territory. 

Today is April 13, 2012 and it has been 10 years since the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague passed its final and binding decision. The ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration is not only final and binding as agreed upon by both parties, but it is also guaranteed by the United Nations, United States, the African Union and the European Union. No other agreement had such a backing and support of the world community. Yet, the United Nations and its powerful security council member, the United States, have not only allowed Ethiopia to renege on the agreement it signed but to remain in occupation of sovereign Eritrean territories for the last ten years. 

To add insult to injury, the United Nations also passed two resolutions, resolution 1907 and resolution 2023 that: 

  1. Limit Eritrean ability for self defense, especially as Ethiopia continues to occupy its sovereign territories and threatens its existence as a sovereign country. 
  2. Limiting the government of Eritrea's ability to improve the standard of living of its people by restricting international investments in the booming mining sector and the restriction of remittance of its citizens abroad. 

If the people of Eritrea have felt wronged by the world body and especially the United States when the United Nations federated Eritrea with Ethiopia in 1950, setting off the 30 years of independence war, it has not fared any better today. No lessons have been learned by US leaders or the international community. 

Today, thousands of Eritreans have been displaced by the continued occupation of Eritrean territories by Ethiopia. Ethiopia continues to threaten Eritrea's existence by provoking the nation through cross border raids, killing innocent civilians and open support of known terrorist groups. The world body continues to remain silent to the continued injustice against Eritrea today as it has in the past. 

If the United States wants to be taken seriously as a broker of peace in the world, then it must enforce agreements it guarantees and force its ally Ethiopia to allow the physical demarcation of the border to proceed in accordance with the delimitation and demarcation decisions it witnessed and guaranteed. Justice demands that agreements signed in good faith be respected. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Response to Former Ethiopian President Mulatu Teshome Wirtu's article on Al Jazeera

A Response to "To Avoid Another Conflict in the Horn of Africa, Now is the Time to Act" by Former Ethiopian President Mulatu Teshome Wirtu on Al Jazeera By: Yemane Abselom (wedi abselom) February 18, 2025 For decades, global news reporting has been dominated by Western media outlets such as the BBC (British), VOA (American), and DW (German). While these outlets claim to uphold principles of free and independent journalism, their coverage often aligns with Western political and economic agendas. When Al Jazeera emerged, there was hope that it would provide an alternative voice—one that would prioritize the interests of the Middle East and the Global South. Its early reporting on Iraq and Afghanistan, which exposed Western propaganda and war crimes, won it widespread respect. However, telling the truth comes at a cost, and it appears that those financing Al Jazeera were unwilling to continue paying that price. Over time, its editorial stance has drifted closer to that of Wester...

Are members of Anonymous an unwitting tool of the Ethiopian government's campaign against Eritrea?

The history of injustice by successive Ethiopian rulers against the people of Eritrea are too numerous to list here.  In the interest of time, allow me to focus on recent attempts by the government of Ethiopia to muzzle the people and government of Eritrea. In 1998, the government of Ethiopia lied to its people and the international community when it claimed Eritrea invaded Badme, a territory it falsely claimed as Ethiopian.  Soon after, Ethiopia declared war on Eritrea. After much blood was shed on both sides, the government of Ethiopia was forced to take the matter to an international arbitration court in The Hague.    The ruling of the court was agreed to be final and binding by both parties and was witnessed and guaranteed by the United States, the United Nations, the African Union and the European Union.   The court ruled that Badme, the flashpoint of the war, was a sovereign Eritrean territory and had been so for over 100 years. However, the gov...

A response to Professor Joel Brinkley: Eritrea has a remarkable story to tell

Professor Joel Brinkley wrote an article on the San Francisco Chronicle under the title "Eritrea, the most repressive nation on Earth", on April 29, 2012.  When Joel Brinkley, a professor of journalism at Stanford University and a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, writes on Eritrea, one hopes it would be an original piece that explores the complex issues in depth.  However, the contents of his column were nothing but a copy and paste of several reports that have misleading information on Eritrea and a complete avoidance of current and recent events that lead us to where we are today.  Professor Brinkley has chosen to ignore the elephant in the room and he expects us to do the same. It is true Eritrea won its independence in 1991, after waging a 30 years long and bitter struggle for independence.  Between 1991 and 1998, before the war with Ethiopia broke out, Eritrea under the current leadership had won many accolades, including the New York Times, ...